First off, I will be referencing to this YouTube video:
First off, the video establishes credibility--whoever is speaking comes from a firm that specializes in patent law. This is extremely important as the patent process is a long and grueling one.
Now to the speaker: the speaker is very clear, offers examples, stresses key points, and the video editing is such that it provides strategic pauses. All of these points together lend the viewer a sense of peace and safety--there is time to understand the material, examples to show real-life scenarios, and not so much information that would overwhelm a listener.
Now to the content: the content is split into two parts--novelty and obviousness. While this week we are focusing primarily on obviousness, it is important that he mention both in the same video as they are connected to each other. Novelty is associated with a single prior art, whereas obviousness is associated with more than 1. By explaining them in conjunction with each other, he enables the viewer to understand the difference and as a result, build a better patent application.
Most importantly, the speaker does not overwhelm the viewer. Almost every other article and video seeks to explain obviousness very succinctly (too little information) or very in-depth (too much information). This video provides the basics, but also backs them up with examples, leaving the step-by-step process for the next video.
No comments:
Post a Comment